Wednesday, October 22, 2014

Maryland will miss…Lynne Vyner Shpak

Courtesy of The Equiery:


Maryland will miss…Lynne Vyner Shpak

Lynne and Chevy Low Res
Lynne Shpak with her beloved Chief of State (a.k.a. Chevy) and sporting one of her custom designed pieces of jewelry.
On Sunday, October 19, 2014, the Maryland equestrian community lost beloved Morgan sport horse breeder and jewelry designer Lynne Shpak, who was killed in a freak accident while unloading an injured horse. She was 74.
The incident occurred near Utica, New York, where Lynne had traveled with a horse and a cart to help celebrate the wedding of a client and a friend. Lynne would want us to note that it was not one of her Morgans involved in the accident.
Born in 1940, Lynne climbed into the saddle at 4 and never left. She rode hunters and jumpers and broke yearlings at the track. In her early twenties, she discovered to dressage, carriage driving, long distance riding and the Morgan horse. In 1969, she established her Morgan breeding and training farm in Woodstock, naming it in honor of her foundation stallion The Statesman. With The Statesman, Lynne paved the way for the modern sport Morgan. Together they foxhunted, showed successfully through 4th level dressage, and drove in carriage events in the days before combined driving, competing in pleasure and obstacle classes, carriage, and marathon classes. The Statesman was undefeated in this early combined events. Through The Statesman’s bloodlines, Lynne has helped to define the modern Morgan sport horse.
In addition to the horses, Lynne was a well-respected fine jewelry designer, and a regular presence at regional trade shows as well as several Baltimore locations.
Formal services will be held 

Monday, August 18, 2014

MDA Awards $1 Million for Innovative Manure Management Technologies

       
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                         CONTACT:  Julie Oberg, 410-841-5888
                                        Vanessa Orlando, 410-841-5889

MDA Awards $1 Million for Innovative Manure Management Technologies
Demonstration Projects in Howard, Frederick and Worcester Counties Recognized

POCOMOKE, MD (August 15, 2014) – The Maryland Department of Agriculture (MDA) today awarded more than $1 million in grants for three animal waste management technology projects. MDA Secretary Buddy Hance, Maryland Energy Administration Director Abigail Ross Hopper, along with other state and local officials, joined together for a check presentation ceremony to Planet Found Energy Development and Green Mountain Technologies for implementation of their demonstration projects. The event was held at Millennium Farms in Worcester County.

“By working to reach our sustainability goals, we’ll grow our renewable energy portfolio and reduce the amount of run-off going into our precious Bay. This program is a win-win for our State,” said Governor Martin O’Malley. “Investing in Maryland’s in-state renewable energy boosts our economy, ensures that we have abundant energy resources well into the future and creates more jobs and opportunity for more Marylanders.”

The O’Malley/Brown Administration’s investment in innovation led to the revitalization of the Animal Waste Technology Fund. The Fund provides incentives to companies that demonstrate new technologies on farms and provide alternative strategies for managing animal manure. These technologies generate energy from animal manure, reduce on-farm waste streams, and repurpose manure by creating marketable fertilizer and other products and by-products. MDA plans to award a total of $2 million of the $2.5 million available in FY2014. Funds not awarded during FY2014 will be added to a new round of requests for proposals to demonstrate innovative manure management technologies, totaling $3 million in FY2015.

“These projects will help farmers address challenges in managing manure under new nutrient management requirements,” said Secretary Hance. “Projects funded have the potential to increase energy independence, enhance animal waste management, improve water quality, and reduce greenhouse gases – all of which will result in advanced Chesapeake Bay restoration and help farms become sustainable.”

Today, MDA announced the first two grant awardees: 
Planet Found Energy Development (PFED) – $676,144.47 – uses an anaerobic digester linked to a nutrient recovery system to produce electricity (26 kWh plant producing an estimated 100,000 kW/yr) for parasitic load and will use net metering to send any excess electricity back to the grid. Excess heat may be used to offset propane costs for poultry house heating. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium are to be partitioned into three separate fertilizer products for on-farm use or sale. The dry weight of the poultry litter is reduced by 50 percent and the fiber by-product has the potential to be re-used as poultry bedding. Millennium Farms, owned/operated by Jason and Kim Lambertson, is in Worcester County and has six poultry houses. Although pairing the two components is new, both have been proven as stand- alone systems. PFED broke ground on the anaerobic digester component of the project this spring and will use grant funds from the State to support the nutrient capture system.

“Our team at Planet Found Energy Development is excited to work with the Maryland Department of Agriculture in finding alternative ways to utilize poultry manure,” said PFED Partner Jason Lambertson. “Our partnership the first step in helping the agricultural community use a current resource as renewable energy while reducing key nutrients that have a great impact on the future of the poultry industry in Maryland. We welcome this opportunity to be a part of a solution.”

Green Mountain Technologies, Inc (GMT) – $388,310 – Although composting is not new, the in-vessel system is a closed system reducing variability of environmental factors impacting composting success. The vendor offers this as a turnkey operation and provides ongoing management support which reduces farm operator time, labor requirements and potential error. GMT proposed two individual projects for in-vessel composting:  The first is a small composter at a horse rescue facility in Howard County where nutrients and by-products will be reduced by 50 percent. GMT is in discussion to market this compost to vendors who sell planting medium for nursery production. The second project is larger and will be implemented on a dairy farm in Frederick County that also will process the offal from its turkey production and processing facility. The agricultural operation is owned and managed by Eugene Iager, who is exploring the use of the compost for dairy bedding and opportunities for marketing it. GMT operates out of Seattle, Wash., and they will use web-enabled controllers and probes to monitor temperatures and manage the composter remotely when not on site.

“Green Mountain Technologies is honored to have two projects selected by MDA. We realize that the agricultural industry must be given waste management options that are not only environmentally sustainable but also financially sustainable,” said GMT Agricultural Sales Specialist Mollie Bogardus. “We believe in furthering the market channels for the value added products created through quality composting of the waste from dairies, equine facilities and poultry sites. These grants will provide Maryland farms examples of successful composting operations.”

In January 2014, MDA issued a Request for Proposals for demonstration projects with proven and innovative technologies that manage agricultural manure and on-farm generated waste in a manner that improves its utility as a fertilizer, changes its form or function for alternative uses, or produces energy or other marketable products. The overall outcome of the technology will result in reduction of nitrogen and/or phosphorus movement to surface waters associated with animal manure produced on farms in Maryland.
Maryland’s nutrient management regulations govern the amount, timing, and placement of crop nutrients—including manure and other organic nutrient sources—on agricultural land to prevent excess nutrients from impacting waterways. To help poultry and livestock producers comply with the regulations, Maryland is supporting and investing in alternative uses for manure such as fertilizer manufacturing, composting and manure-to-energy projects, and the development of new products that add value to improve farm viability.

MDA received eight bids, which were reviewed by a six-member technical review subcommittee. The subcommittee represented diverse skill sets and backgrounds and its members were chosen from the 20-member Advisory Committee for the Animal Waste Technology Fund. Three of the recommended projects were approved by the Board of Public Works on Wednesday, August 13. An award for one additional project is expected to be made this fall, following Board of Public Works approval.

Learn more about Maryland’s sustainable policies, practices and programs at green.maryland.gov and follow us @GreenMaryland.

# # #

EDITOR'S NOTE: PHOTOS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Truck and Trailer Clinic: April 17th 2014

Truck and Trailer Clinic
April 17th 2014
6pm at the
West Friendship Fire Hall
At the corner of Rt 32 and Rt 99
12535 State Rt. 99/ Old Frederick Rd
Sykesville, MD. 21784

If you haul on the state of Maryland Highways
You are going to want to know the latest laws
We will also have a Truck and Horse Trailer
On site to demonstrate proper hook up
And pre road adjustments, such as brakes
And light checks as well as Combination
Weight Laws now in effect for all Types of Trailer Combinations

We will have an Officer from the
Maryland State Highway Administration
On hand to present and answer questions

For more Info and to Register Free
Please contact Howard County Farm Bureau
Howie Feaga at 410-531-2360
Please leave a message or email me at
Howie@merryacresfarm.com

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

HELP for Howard County Farm Owners


HELP for Howard County Farm Owners
Assembled by the University of Maryland Extension (Aug. 2013)

Farm owners want to do what is best for their plants, animals, and the environment, but sometimes it can be hard to know where to start! Fortunately, there are a lot of free and useful resources to help farmers make well‐informed and responsible choices.

The attached resources should give all farm owners a place to start when considering implementing best management practices for their operations or just looking for trustworthy information.

General Agricultural and Environmental Information
University of Maryland Extension

Howard County Extension Office
Extension is a nationwide educational network that brings the research and knowledge of landgrant
institutions to people in their homes, workplaces, and communities. University of
Maryland Extension (UME) is a statewide, non‐formal education system within the College of
Agriculture and Natural Resources at the College Park Campus and the University of Maryland
Eastern Shore. Faculty and staff at the state and county level provide Maryland citizens with non
biased, research based information in the form of events, publications, workshops and classes.
UME offices are located in every county as well as in Baltimore City. Our agricultural specialists
can help you with farm finances, design, and management of the land and livestock.

eXtension
eXtension is an online resource unlike any other search engine or information‐based website. It
provides peer reviewed, reliable, free information from university extension educators in the
form of articles, webinars and videos. An “Ask the Expert” feature allows questions to be
submitted directly to university specialists. eXtension resources cover a wide range of topic
areas including but not limited to the following:
Ag Safety and Health Hogs, Pigs, and Pork
Animal Manure Management Horses
Animal Welfare Organic Agriculture
Apples Plant Breeding and Genomics
Bee Health Sheep
Beef Cattle Small and Backyard Flocks
Blueberries Small Meat Processors
Corn and Soybean Production


Howard Soil Conservation District
The Howard Soil Conservation District's staff of trained specialists helps landowners make wise
land use decisions for their properties. Cost sharing assistance from federal, state and/or local
sources may be available for conservation practices that control erosion and improve water
quality. The Howard Soil Conservation District is solely authorized to review sediment and
erosion control plans and small pond designs for all proposed developments.

Home and Garden Information Center
The HGIC provides information on growing lawns, flowers, and vegetables, along with
answering plant and garden pest questions.


Farm Business Resources
Beginning Farmer Success
Beginning Farmer Success is a UME partnership program providing farmers with tools and
education to explore, refine, develop and implement farm businesses.

Maryland Rural Enterprise Development Center
MREDC, a UME Community Resource and Economic Development Online Initiative, is a onestop‐
shop for the 21st century agricultural/natural resource entrepreneur, provides successful
rural business innovation strategies for your farm business plan, and your production and
management techniques. Learn anywhere by using the many distance learning tools delivered
on MREDC in audio, video, or other interactive format that are organized in modules. These
unique modules and tools are designed to help you get information quickly and make informed
decisions.

Nutrient Management
UME Nutrient Management Program
The University Agricultural Nutrient Management Program, which is funded by the MDA,
provides the following services: nutrient management plan development for Maryland farmers
through a network of nutrient management advisors located in all 23 county Extension offices;
and continuing education and technical support for certified nutrient management consultants
and certified farm operators via state and regional nutrient management specialists.

Howard County UME Nutrient Management Advisor:
Krista Mitchell
3300 N. Ridge Road, Suite 240
Ellicott City, MD 21043
410‐313‐2709
Fax: 410‐313‐2712

Small Flock Poultry Production
UME Small Flock Production
The Small Flock Production section of the UME Poultry website contains information on caring
for both egg and meat production birds along with links to MDA’s regulations regarding selling
of eggs and meat in Maryland.

Dr. Nick Zimmermann
Associate Professor, Animal and Avian Sciences
Extension Poultry Specialist
University of Maryland, College Park
Phone: 301‐405‐2805

Dr. Jonathan R. Moyle
Associate Professor, Extension Poultry Specialist
University of Maryland, Eastern Shore
Phone: 410‐742‐1178 ext. 309

Sheep and Goat Resources
UME Sheep and Goat
UME Sheep and Goat Specialist, Susan Schoenian maintains these websites full of great
information for sheep and goat owners.

Susan Schoenian
Phone: 301‐432‐2767 x343
Fax: 301‐432‐4089

Maryland Sheep Breeders Association

Maryland Dairy Goat Association


Equine Resources
University of Maryland Equine Studies and Equine Extension
The Equine Studies Program at the University of Maryland offers educational programs for
youth and adults interested in learning more about the care, use, and management of horses.

Dr. Amy Burk
Associate Professor & Extension Horse Specialist
Equine Studies Program Coordinator
Phone: 301‐405‐8337

UME Equine Rotational Grazing Demonstration Site
The Equine Rotational Grazing Demonstration Farm is part of the Central Maryland Research
and Educational Center in Clarksville, Maryland. The site was developed to educate equine farm
operators how to better manage their pastures to benefit horses and the environment.
Educational events are held there throughout the year.

Horse Outreach Workgroup
The Horse Outreach Workgroup provides how‐to documents to help horse owners with their
pasture and manure management issues. The workgroup consists of representatives from local
Soil Conservation Districts, MDA, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Cooperative Extension,
University of Maryland, the Equiery, and the Maryland Horse Industry Board. The MDA’s Office
of Resource Conservation provides coordination for the workgroup.

Howard County MDA Equine Planner
Based in the Howard County Soil Conservation office, MDA Equine Planners offer free advice for
horse farm operators on establishing best management practices for their farms and properties,
providing one on one consultations regarding pasture management, environmental concerns,
water management, and erosion control.

My Horse University
My Horse University (MHU) was established in 2005 at Michigan State University, the pioneer
land‐grant university with nationally‐ranked programs in equine science and management.
MHU brings research and knowledge from world‐renowned experts to online courses and
products. MHU’s courses provide a comprehensive and convenient learning experience for horse
enthusiasts throughout the world.




Thursday, July 25, 2013

Howard County DPZ releases specific amendments reflecting July 19 meeting with stakeholders

Courtesy of The Equiery: http://equiery.com/blog/?p=1819


On Friday, July 19, 2013, officials from the Howard County Department of Planning and Zoning and the Councilwoman chairing the Comprehensive Zoning Planning Committee met with state equine industry leaders as well as Howard County stakeholders to review problematic amendments to the county zoning plan. For a detailed list of who was involved with that meeting,please read our July 19 post. Lively discussion continued over the weekend and well into the start of this week, making it a herculean challenge for DPZ to finalize the changes to the amendments, but late yesterday, Tuesday, July 23, those changes were finally released.
Earlier today, The Equiery posted the amendments as straight text. DPZ provided this handy, color coded version to make it easier to follow all the changes, so we are now providing this version as well (in case this seems to be a redundant post; we do intend to remove the earlier post). Bluereflects changes made as a result of the meeting with stakeholders on Friday, July 19.
The County Council will vote on the comprehensive zoning plan tomorrow, Thursday, July 25. Councilwoman Mary Kay Sigaty assured participants in the stakeholder’s meeting that refinements could continue to be made, even after the Council votes on the overall comprehensive plan.
LIVESTOCK: ANIMALS TYPICALLY KEPT FOR FARMING PURPOSES, SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COWS, GOATS, HORSES AND OTHER EQUUS, POULTRY AND OTHER FOWL, SHEEP, OR SWINE. FISH AND OTHER AQUATIC ANIMALS RAISED BY AQUAFARMING ARE CONSIDERED TO BE LIVESTOCK. CATS, DOGS, RABBITS AND OTHER SIMILAR SMALL ANIMALS OFTEN KEPT AS PETS ARE NOT CONSIDERED TO BE LIVESTOCK. BEES ARE NOT CONSIDERED TO BE LIVESTOCK.
Revise a current definition:
ANIMAL UNIT: A UNIT OF MEASUREMENT USED TO REGULATE THE NUMBER OF LIVESTOCK [[ANIMAL TYPES]] ON A RESIDENTIAL LOT OR PARCEL, BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO FARMS [[BASED ON THE POTENTIAL FOR PASTURAGE]]. ONE ANIMAL UNIT EQUALS THE FOLLOWING:
A. ONE HORSE, [[OR]] MULE, OR COW.
B. TWO PONIES, MINIATURE HORSES, DONKEYS, OR PIGS.
C. FOUR LLAMAS OR [[ALPACAS]] OSTRICHES.
D. [[FIVE]] TEN SHEEP, [[OR]] GOATS, OR ALPACAS
ANIMAL UNIT RATIO REQUIREMENTS FOR OTHER LIVESTOCK OR IMMATURE ANIMALS OR FOWL SHALL BE MADE ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS USING GENERALLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION ON ANIMAL UNIT EQUIVALENCIES AND THE GENERALLY ACCEPTED RATIO THAT ONE ANIMAL UNIT APPROXIMATELY EQUALS 1,000 POUNDS OF LIVE ANIMAL WEIGHT. FISH AND OTHER AQUATIC ANIMALS IN AQUAFARMING FACILITIES ARE NOT SUBJECT TO ANIMAL UNIT REQUIREMENTS.
Revise a current definition:
[[76.]] Farm: A lot or parcel [[principally]] used for farming [[WHICH RECEIVES THE AGRICULTURAL USE ASSESSMENT FOR TAX PURPOSES, IN ACCORDANCE WITH COMAR 18.02.03.]] THAT IS 3.0 ACRES OR LARGER[[[Council Bill 9-2011 (ZRA-130) Effective 7/4/11]]]
Revise a current definition:
[[77.]] Farming: The use of land for agricultural purposes, including: [[agriculture, apiaries, horticulture, orchards, agricultural nurseries, viticulture, aquaculture, silviculture, and animal and poultry husbandry. Farming includes basic processing of agricultural products as defined in this section (see “agricultural processing, primary”), but shall not include the acceptance or disposal of land clearing debris or rubble which originates off-site or the commercial feeding of garbage or offal to swine or other animals. The breeding, raising, training, boarding and general care of livestock for uses other than for food, such as sport or show purposes, as pets, or for recreation, shall be considered a normal farming function, but kennels are excluded from this definition.]]
A. CROP PRODUCTION, APIARIES, HORTICULTURE, ORCHARDS, AGRICULTURAL NURSERIES, VITICULTURE, SILVICULTURE, AQUACULTURE, AND ANIMAL AND POULTRY HUSBANDRY;
B. THE GROWING, HARVESTING AND PRIMARY PROCESSING OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS;
C. THE BREEDING, RAISING, TRAINING, BOARDING AND GENERAL CARE OF LIVESTOCK FOR USES OTHER THAN FOOD, SUCH AS SPORT OR SHOW PURPOSES, AS PETS OR FOR RECREATION.
D. THE OPERATION OF AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT THAT IS AN ACCESSORY USE TO A [[PRINCIPAL]] FARMING FUNCTION. AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT MAY BE USED ON FARMS THAT ARE NOT THE FARM ON WHICH THE MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT IS NORMALLY STORED;
E. THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF BARNS, SILOS AND OTHER SIMILAR STRUCTURES SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE BULK REGULATIONS;
F. THE TRANSPORTATION, STORAGE, HANDLING AND APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER, SOIL AMENDMENTS, PESTICIDES AND MANURE, SUBJECT TO ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LAWS; [[AND]]
G. THE TEMPORARY, ONSITE PROCESSING OF CHICKENS OR RABBITS ON A FARM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AGRICULTURE ARTICLE OF THE ANNOTATED CODE OF MARYLAND; AND
[[G]]H. OTHER USES DIRECTLY RELATED TO, OR AS AN ACCESSORY USE OF, THE PREMISES’ FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES.
Revise a current definition:
[[193.]] Structure: Anything constructed or built [[, the use of which requires permanent location on the ground, or attached to something having permanent location on the ground]]. The following shall not be considered structures for bulk regulation purposes:
a. [[Awnings]]ACCESSORY ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS, AWNINGS, bus shelters, exterior lighting fixtures, fire hydrants, mail boxes, telephone, ELECTRICAL OR CABLEequipment boxes, newspaper boxes and survey monuments;
b. Gardens, driveways, walks, patios, and parking surfaces;
c. Ground level decks, limited to decks elevated 18 inches or less above average grade and having no railing, walls or roofing;
D. OUTDOOR BARBECUES AND FIREPITS IF 18 INCHES OR LESS HIGH ABOVE AVERAGE GRADE.
[[d.]]E. Noise barriers or noise walls;
[[e.]]F. Signs are not considered to be a structure or part of a structure, and are regulated by the Howard County Code.
[[f.]]G. Stormwater management facilities;
H. ALL STRUCTURES EXEMPT FROM SETBACK COMPLIANCE IN SECTION 128.0.A
I. OUTDOOR RIDING RINGS, RUN-IN SHEDS OR SIMILAR FARM STRUCTURES WITH A MAXIMUM OF THREE WALLS AND A MAXIMUM FOOTPRINT OF 500 SQUARE FEET, AND COMPOSTING BINS AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTALLY-BENEFICIAL FARM STRUCTURES.
[[g.]]I. Similar minor structures as determined by the Department of Planning and Zoning on a case-by-case basis.
Revise a current definition:
ZONING PERMIT: A DOCUMENT ISSUED BY THE HOWARD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING AUTHORIZING AN ENTITY TO BEGIN [[AN ACTIVITY]] CERTAIN ACTIVITIES OR USES [[PROVIDED FOR]] AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 128.0 OF THESE ZONING REGULATIONS.
In each district which currently permits farming:
Farming.[[[[]], provided that on a [[lot]] RESIDENTIAL LOT OR PARCEL of less than 40,000 square feet [[, no fowl other than for the normal use of the family residing on the lot and]] no livestock shall be permitted[[]]]], HOWEVER, RESIDENTIAL CHICKEN KEEPING IS ALLOWED AS NOTED IN SECTION 128.0.
Revise current subsection in Section 128.0:
10. LIVESTOCK ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS OR PARCELS
[[ONLY]] IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS WHERE IT IS ENUMERATED AS AN ACCESSORY USE, LIVESTOCK ARE PERMITTED ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS OR PARCELS SUBJECT TO THE CRITERIA BELOW.
A. THE LOT OR PARCEL SIZE SHALL BE [[3 ACRES]] 40,000 SQUARE FEET OR LARGER.
[[B. THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE SHALL BE IN USE AS A DWELLING.]]
C. THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF LIVESTOCK ANIMALS IS ONE ANIMAL UNIT OR FRACTION THEREOF FOR EACH [[1.5 ACRES]] 1.0 ACRE OF LOT AREA, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT A HIGHER RATIO MAY BE ALLOWED AFTER THE PROPERTY OWNER OBTAINS AND IMPLEMENTS A NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN AND COLLABORATES WITH THE HOWARD COUNTY SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT TO DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT A SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION PLAN FOR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT.
D. THE ANIMAL SHELTER LOCATION(S) SHALL COMPLY WITH THE ANIMAL SHELTER SETBACK REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 128.0.[[B.]] A. SETBACK VARIANCES, HOWEVER, MAY BE APPROVED BY THE HEARING AUTHORITY.
Revise Section 128.0.A.4
[[4. Required Setback for Certain Farm Uses
200 feet of an existing dwelling on a different lot:
a. An animal shelter including a building, shed, roofed structure or movable shelter that houses or provides protection for animals other than household pets, except for apiaries which meet the requirements of subsection O; or
[Council Bill 55-2010 (ZRA-117) Effective April 13, 2011]
b. The storage of manure.]]
4. ANIMAL SHELTER SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
STRUCTURES USED FOR THE HOUSING, BOARDING, OR SHELTERING OF ANIMALS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO BARNS, BUILDINGS, HUTCHES, SHEDS, ROOFED STRUCTURES, AND PREFABRICATED MOVEABLE ANIMAL HOUSES, AND ANY AREAS USED FOR THE STORAGE OF ANIMAL EXCREMENT, [[SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 200 FEET FROM ANY EXISTING DWELLING ON A DIFFERENT LOT AND]] SHALL COMPLY WITH THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACK REQUIREMENT FOR THE APPLICABLE ZONING DISTRICT. [[THE FOLLOWING ARE EXEMPTED FROM THIS REQUIREMENT:]]
IN ADDITION, ANIMAL SHELTERS MEASURING LARGER THAN 500 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 200 FEET FROM ANY EXISTING DWELLING ON A DIFFERENT LOT AND ANIMAL SHELTERS 500 SQUARE FEET OR SMALLER SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM 100 FEET FROM ANY EXISTING DWELLING ON A DIFFERENT LOT. THE FOLLOWING ARE EXEMPTED FROM THIS REQUIREMENT:
A. SHELTERS USED FOR HOUSEHOLD PETS.
B. SHELTERS USED FOR RESIDENTIAL CHICKEN KEEPING WHICH COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR SUCH STRUCTURES AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 128.0.D.
C. APIARIES WHICH COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 128.0.N.
Revise Section 128.0.I
There are 8 special farm uses with varying criteria and we have clarified for each the language about not having a significant adverse impact on neighboring properties. We’ve clarified that this means:
“FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, ADVERSE IMPACT SHALL NOT INCLUDE ANY IMPACT NORMALLY ASSOCIATED WITH FARMS FOLLOWING GENERALLY ACCEPTED AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES OR FARMS OPERATING PERMITTED USES UNDER THIS SECTION”